User talk:Multichill

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:BotMultichillT)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Always busy.

Bahasa Indonesia  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  română  español  português  English  français  Nederlands  polski  galego  Simple English  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  ქართული  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Welcome to my talk page. Use it; don't send me e-mail.

I reply to messages left on my talk, on my talk page. If I left a message on your talk page, I will reply there (unless you specify otherwise).

Geograph upload gap[edit]

I've just noticed that there's a gap of about 19,000 pictures in uploads from Geograph Britain and Ireland between 1780732 and 1800000. See this Quarry query. Maybe you could have GeographBot go back and fill it in? --bjh21 (talk) 10:32, 7 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Bjh21: that's weird? Maybe I started the upload at a too high number? I can probably fill the gap. I'll have a look at it. Multichill (talk) 17:26, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I stumbled across another block of missed pictures, so I've made a different version of the query. This one searches for all blocks of 1000 geograph IDs where fewer than 800 of them are present on Commons (limited to somewhere below where GeographBot is currently working). Looks like there might be a total of about 70,000 missing files. --bjh21 (talk) 13:07, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Not sure how to approach this yet. I would rather not upload files that have been previously deleted. Multichill (talk) 14:06, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I think you should get a duplicate-archive warning if you try to upload a file that's identical to one that's been deleted. And also a was-deleted warning if you use the same name it had before. I presume you already handle the duplicate warning to avoid re-uploading files that are already on Commons. --bjh21 (talk) 16:30, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

REMOVE IMAGE[edit]

Please, I was wrong with this image. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gabe_Abrahams,_2023.jpg

What should I do to remove it?

--Walking34 (talk) 09:22, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Editing recent Geograph photos[edit]

Hi Multichill - I was trying to add details of the bird depicted in File:Beach at Brighton - geograph.org.uk - 2267277.jpg, but when I opened the edit window, all it had was "{{Geograph from structured data}}" (your creation, it seems!) with no infobox, and my addition (see the file's history) didn't end up in the right place. How do I edit it to add this information so it shows in the normal manner in an infobox? Should it be added to Category:Media missing infobox template, too? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 13:17, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category discussion warning

Kirklees, Calderdale has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:49, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Epizykloiden.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ChristiaanPR (talk) 20:22, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Translating the file from german to dutch didn't work very well. I propose to delete the current file, so that it is easier to create the file once more, but then in dutch. I have a copy. ChristiaanPR (talk) 16:31, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@ChristiaanPR: you need to make your comments at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Epizykloiden.png, not here, or the closing admin probably won't see them. Also, if you want to upload an improved version, just do it by uploading a new version over the old one. It looks like you already did so at least once (although, really, to change language in labels you should upload under a new file name: remember that people are allowed to embed files outside of WMF projects, and we have no way to know where else this might be in use; this might not be an "improvement" to some German-language website that is using this). . - Jmabel ! talk 18:41, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It had maybe something to do with my cache. The image is now right at its place. ChristiaanPR (talk) 18:55, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:Motorway Ahead (IRL).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EthanL13 (talk) 12:22, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Moritz Calisch (1819-1870) - portret Salomon David Cohen - M006732 - Jewish Museum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Peli (talk) 20:32, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Moritz Calisch (1819-1870) - portret Vrouwtje Salomon Cohen - M006733 - Jewish Museum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Peli (talk) 20:33, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

hi dear Multichill,

I would like to inform you that the site of the Kunsthistorisches museum has published other historical portraits. are you by any chance managing the bot? because if that were the case I would like to let you know about the site updates, because taking a tour of the site I noticed that there are new portraits that it would be nice to see them uploaded by that bot if it were possible?? :) I notice that as a "defect" in the categories, it only puts the name of the museum with that of the artist, but not that of the portrayed subject... I spent my time inserting the categories of the characters and I must say that it was quite fun to do it :) I find it really interesting Nesinatra (talk) 18:54, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Comment: I would like to inform that Nesinatra is in fact another sockpuppet of LTA A3cb1. I opened a CU request here. 81.41.175.237 22:46, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:UBB 0001 Wegweiser.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lukas Beck (talk) 14:48, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 19:58, 15 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Can you please delete File:Avatar 2002 Poster.png[edit]

Reason: I can’t upload a new revision Jajsnznznzajbnlasdjje280.223 (talk) 20:25, 24 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deleted, but don't upload it again. That's a copyright violation. Multichill (talk) 20:29, 24 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:29, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:M Messing.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vera (talk) 15:55, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Tiamat.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 02:49, 12 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Volthe - Volte[edit]

Hi Multichill.

Overal in de beschrijvingen in deze zoeklijst staat Volte, maar dit moet zijn: Volthe. De beschrijvingen geven links naar een foutieve categorie. Enkele heb ik al handmatig aangepast, maar de fout kan ik niet massaal met een botje oplossen. Search vindt deze lijst niet voor mij voor een batchtask. De adressen zijn overigens vreemd ingevuld, de gemeente is Dinkelland, plaatsdeel /stadsdeel Rossum, buurt Volthe. Is die link naar Commonscat:Volte te wijzigen svp. Fraaier als de bestandsnamen ook zouden kloppen, maar alas. Bedankt. Peli (talk) 13:30, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Peli Ik heb het wat opgepoetst. Multichill (talk) 15:14, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:Interieur, overzicht kapel met moderne muurschilderingen (Hans Truijen, 1978) - Lemiers - 20001661 - RCE.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bahnmoeller (talk) 09:45, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Interieur, kapel met moderne muurschilderingen (Hans Truijen, 1978), detail - Lemiers - 20001667 - RCE.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bahnmoeller (talk) 09:45, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Interieur, kapel met moderne muurschilderingen (Hans Truijen, 1978), detail, signatuur (noordmuur) - Lemiers - 20001672 - RCE.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bahnmoeller (talk) 09:46, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Tabelklinkerbotsing.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

bdijkstra (overleg) 10:10, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lobbes JPG 1a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:A03F:C714:A300:5832:C606:A933:1202 22:24, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
Just great multichill stuff – much apprechiated Pippich (talk) 19:35, 27 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alicia Fagerving (WMSE) (talk) 12:45, 30 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"Derivative work"?[edit]

I don't understand this edit. [1] That is not a derivative work. It's a literal reproduction of a page of comics. It was uploaded by the artist (a friend of an acquaintance, who contacted me about this because I'm familiar with Wikipedia) so that it could be used to illustrate the article about her. She included a valid CC license for that, and the copyright information is in the image. What more would be needed? JasonAQuest (talk) 15:26, 6 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@JasonAQuest and Luddite19: unfortunately we have a lot of people scanning things and uploading it as their own work. In this case it looked like that. Great that she contributed some images. Would be best if Sharon Rudahl releases this image and the others using VTRS, see Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team#Declaration_of_consent_for_all_enquiries. That would prevent any future problems. I removed the problem tag. Multichill (talk) 10:25, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hansmuller (talk) 20:05, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Main page vandalism[edit]

Hi Multichill! In fact I rollbacked a vandalism, as you did: there is no difference between our versions. Jaqen (talk) 06:32, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Debivort iceland-Route 41 between Keflavík and Njardvík.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:40, 13 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:US Navy 091209-N-2475A-020 Logistics Specialist 2nd Class Dan Foster, from Hutchinson, Kan., performs respirator fit tests on Sailors in hangar bay one.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ilzolende (talk) 07:11, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]