Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Canada goose flight cropped and NR.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image:Canada goose flight cropped and NR.jpg - featured[edit]

  •  Support --Gordo 09:21, 5 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Support Absolutely beautiful! --Tomascastelazo 13:44, 5 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Support Great! --Erina 15:12, 5 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Support despite small size - MPF 15:15, 5 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Support Great! --Tone 20:02, 5 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Support --Tarawneh 00:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Support--Jacopo86 09:32, 6 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Support --Ziga 20:54, 6 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Support --Wongsamuel 04:37, 7 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Support WHOHAAA! --Jollyroger 14:59, 7 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Support El ComandanteHasta ∞ 17:26, 7 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Strong support — Love the bokeh. Indon 10:51, 8 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Support - There is not only lab picture ! :-) Declic 12:59, 8 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Comment - the copyright info is strange. The original is copyrighted by Alan D. Wilson, www.naturespicsonline.com, under cc-by-sa-2.5. The edit by Diliff was marked as self-published (is it suitable in case of minor edits?), dual-licensed under gfdl, and the website name disappeared from the authorship info. --Wikimol 11:07, 11 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Oppose As in many other cases before, my opinion differs from the community's mainstream. The coincidence of the bird's upper boundary with the line of apparent horizon is a considerable compositional flaw. In addition to this the lower parts of the right wing are somewhat blurred. Roger McLassus 19:37, 13 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Support. About the license, just drop Diliff a note, I'm sure that's a non-issue. The composition is ok, the flaw Roger pointed out is not grave at all (IMO). The apparent horizon is not a line, it is significantly blurred, and doesn't make the subject stand out less at all. The shot is good enough and with a subject like this, I suppose you don't really have the luxury of composition... --Dschwen 21:47, 13 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Agree small size but great --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 00:56, 16 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Neutral small size balanced by rarity and technical merits. Lycaon 05:58, 18 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
16 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured Roger McLassus 07:36, 19 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/Image:Canada_goose_flight_cropped_and_NR.jpg&oldid=12008749"